Thank you for your incredible question, Dr. Muinah
Both independent variables in our study were found to influence Organizational
Citizenship Behavior (OCB)- however, the greatest impact came from coaching
leadership, followed closely by transformational leadership. The findings of our study
highlight the importance of both leadership styles in promoting OCB. However,
coaching leadership appears to have a more substantial influence, likely due to its
direct emphasis on individual development and tailored support for employees. This
insight can help organizations prioritize coaching leadership training and development
programs to enhance OCB and, ultimately, improve overall organizational performance
If you have any other questions, please don^t hesitate to contact me
Coaching leadership is closely related to Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) as
it fosters an environment where employees feel valued, supported, and empowered to
go beyond their formal roles. When leaders adopt a coaching approach, they focus on
core elements such as Core Conversations, Performance Application, Critical Skills,
Essential Characteristics, and Key Values, each contributing to the encouragement of
OCB in the following ways like Core Conversations, Performance Application, Critical
Skills, Essential Characteristics, Key Values
If you have any other questions, please don^t hesitate to contact me. thankyou
In this research measuring leadership variables based on the perceptions of
subordinates/employees, does this not have an impact on bias in measurement?
Replies:
Thank you for your inquiry Dr. Indarto, i appreciate your valuable question
There are various methods to measure leadership style, each offering unique
perspectives on a leader^s effectiveness. One widely recognized approach is the 360-
degree feedback measurement, which collects input from employees, peers,
supervisors, and sometimes even external stakeholders. This method provides a
holistic view of the leader^s impact by capturing diverse perspectives from those who
interact closely with the leader in different capacities. In our view, this method is more
objective and comprehensive than self-assessment alone, as it minimizes personal bias
and highlights areas of strength and opportunities for improvement. By integrating
multiple viewpoints, the 360-degree feedback approach enhances the accuracy and
reliability of leadership assessments, ultimately fostering a more nuanced
understanding of leadership effectiveness within the organization
If you have any other questions, please don^t hesitate to contact me. thankyou
