1) What weaknesses does the study identify in the legal and institutional framework for
protecting justice collaborators?
2) From a human rights perspective, how does the principle of ^equality before the
law^ apply to justice collaborators, even when they are suspects or defendants?
3) How does providing protection for justice collaborators also contribute to the
protection of victims by fully uncovering criminal cases?
Replies:
1) There are three weaknesses that we can currently identify
a) First is about submission of a request for justice collaborator to Witness and
Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) where the regulations are still unclear.
b) secondly, to get special treatment, it really depends on the agency handling
the suspect of defendant, and the assessment of whether the person concerned
can be categorized as a justice collaborator or not, then the decision is
determined by the relevant agency
c) the award for a reduced sentence is not binding on the judge.
2) Based on the second principle of Pancasila (civilized humanity)- the 1945
Constitution, Article 28- Law Number 8 of 1981, Article 52- explain the
guarantee of human rights, even though they have become suspects or
defendants, they must still be treated as human beings.
3) protection for justice collaborators can contribute to the protection of victims.
There is Law 13 of 2006 concerning the Witness and Victim Protection Agency
(LPSK). Justice collaborators can make cases clear. victims will receive protection
from LPSK.
Thanks for the presentation, very good...
I^m very interested in the topic of justice collaborators...
Let me ask about the regulation of justice collaborator, has the regulation explained in
detail about the indicators of a person can be said to be a justice collabolator?
Secondly, are there certain guarantees given to justice collabolators? And the last one
is related to human rights, does being a justice collabolator guarantee that a person
does not lose his basic rights?
Replies:
So far there is no specific regulation that can categorize suspects/defendants as
justice collaborators. In practice, justice collaborators are currently submitted by the
suspects/defendants themselves to LPSK. this can be rejected or accepted by LPSK.
there is a guarantee of legal protection for justice collaborators. justice collaborators
will be protected by LPSK.
justice collaborators will not lose their human rights. This is Based on the second
principle of Pancasila (civilized humanity)- the 1945 Constitution, Article 28- Law
Number 8 of 1981, Article 52- explain the guarantee of human rights, even though
they have become suspects or defendants, they must still be treated as human
beings.
Thanks for the presentation, very good...
I^m very interested in the topic of justice collaborators...
Let me ask about the regulation of justice collaborator, has the regulation explained in
detail about the indicators of a person can be said to be a justice collabolator?
Secondly, are there certain guarantees given to justice collabolators? And the last one
is related to human rights, does being a justice collabolator guarantee that a person
does not lose his basic rights?
Replies:
So far there is no specific regulation that can categorize suspects/defendants as
justice collaborators. In practice, justice collaborators are currently submitted by the
suspects/defendants themselves to LPSK. this can be rejected or accepted by LPSK.
there is a guarantee of legal protection for justice collaborators. justice collaborators
will be protected by LPSK.
justice collaborators will not lose their human rights. This is Based on the second
principle of Pancasila (civilized humanity)- the 1945 Constitution, Article 28- Law
Number 8 of 1981, Article 52- explain the guarantee of human rights, even though
they have become suspects or defendants, they must still be treated as human
beings.
